TEXAS JOURNAL, Austin, Texas - Bob Ward, Editor April 18, 1996 lead story: AISD's Counseling Endorses Homosexuality Apparently, AISD thinks the schools are not diverse enough and need more homosexual pupils. According to Caring, AISD's guidance and counseling newsletter, the district's diversity program includes advising pupils who think they may be gay that homosexuality is per- fectly acceptable and anyone who doesn't agree, for whatev- er reason including religious objections, is a bigot who dis- torts the Bible. This newsletter and other material supporting homosexuality has reportedly been distributed to district counselors. Caring, notes that gay and lesbian youths suffer harass- ment by peers, sexual abuse, domestic violence, illness, de- structive behavior, AIDS and other sexually transmitted dis- eases, substance abuse, prostitution, suicide, isolation, paren- tal rejection, running away and low self-esteem. That seems like a lot for a school counselor to take on but Caring sees counselors in "a unique position to address the developmental issues and mental health concerns of ho- mosexually oriented youth and their families." There is no concern that counselors may not be educated or trained to address "mental health concerns" of children or that the fam- ily should consult a professional therapist. Apparently addressing the kids' "mental health concerns" does not mean seeing homosexuality as a problem and help- ing the child discover why he or she has those impulses and then helping him overcome them. As outlined in Caring it means reinforcing those feelings by telling him it's okay and that society, his family, the church and anyone else who disagrees is a bigot who hates him. For example, counselors are told that gay students know society says they are "wrong." The quotation marks tell us that homosexuality isn't really wrong, society is just bigoted and ignorant. Counselors are advised to "be aware of the cultural roles which may affect the students." This includes religious and moral teachings which are defined as obstacles to a child "attaining" what is called "a lifestyle of non-concealment." Contrary to what we're told, the celebrated "wall of sepa- ration" between church and state does not prevent a public school from teaching the Bible, provided what is taught is politically correct. For example, children may learn in church that the Bible condemns homosexuality. But AISD's theologians correct what they consider a doctrinal error. Counselors are in- formed that "scholars and theologians confer (sic) that refer- ences to homosexuality in the Bible are questionable at best." A reading list includes two books about the Bible (Rescuing the Bible from Fundamentalism by Bishop John Spong and What the Bible Really Says About Homosexuality by Daniel Helminiak) but not the Bible it- self. Parents are treated as contemptuously as religion. Guide- lines admonish counselors to "respect confidentiality" and not snitch to parents. They are asked to "Imagine . . . the boy who's (sic) parents withhold affection because they fear it may make him effeminate." They're advised to warn pupils about confiding in parents because they "will probably respond based on a lifetime of information from a homophobic society." Because parents financially support their children, pupils are warned not to tell parents they're gay "until they do not have this weapon to hold over you." Alternatives to parents are listed. They include: AIDS Ser- vices of Austin, a tax-supported agency whose publications feature salacious pictures and gratuitous crudity of language; Out Youth Austin, a homosexual group that advertises in Austin school papers with a hotline kids can call to avoid in- volving parents; and "self-identified affirming counselors" on campus. Most people consider heterosexuality normal, like having two ears, and not something that needs explaining. AISD rejects that claiming only about half the population is hetero- sexual. And a "Heterosexual Questionnaire" asks such ques- tions as: "What do you think caused your heterosexuality?" and "When and how did you first decide you were a hetero- sexual?" The point is that heterosexuality is not the normal state. Accordingly, the right to marry is labeled an unwarranted privilege enjoyed by heterosexuals and unjustly denied to gays. Counselors are told their own attitudes must conform to "current scientific knowledge" which considers homo- sexuality "a normal variation of sexual expression." To advance the notion that homosexuality is normal teachers are told to use same sex couples in math word problems and to problems and to develop "gay history" curricula. Schools are admonished to halt such "inappropriate" practices as inviting "spouses" but not "friends" and encour- aging students to date members of the opposite sex. Assem- blies and film nights with homo- sexual content are recom- mended. "All students," counselors are told need "skills for declining or accepting romantic/sexual overtures with dignity." Parents can be grateful the public schools will teach their kids to swing either way -- with dignity.